Obviously I must provide more arguments to this outrageous claim. Fortunately I feel quite capable of doing it.
n Let us first ask, did high Nazis, like for instance Hans Frank, lose the war on purpose? The answer is naturally negative. Hans Frank even listed Hitler’s errors that contributed to the defeat. He considered them errors.
But I do not, as there are several ways to approach this problem. Let us start from the mythical Elders of Zion. The Japanese government during the war time believed in the existence of the Elders of Zion. They even know who the were. This is because Jacob Schiff had given Japan a large loan, which was the enabling factor why Japan won the Russo-Japanese war. The Protocols of the Learned Elders states that if any country (like Czars Russia) opposes the Elders, they will raise against the country guns of the USA or Japan. The guns of the USA were raised against Germany in the First Wordl War and the payment was the Balfour declaration. Japanese knew that Rothschild had asked for the declaration.
These things were of course widely known to everybody. The only proposal for the Elders has ever been that they included some Jewish bankers and they had Masonic connections (to B’nai B’rith and to Freemasonry). The same forces had earlier supported Masonic revolutions and freedom wars, and they also supported Trotsky, they were the imperialistic connections Trotsky was claimed to have.
These Elders could be located to the City of London and the Wall Street, but they had their people in many high places. They advanced Jewish, British and American interests and they had some intense wish to move Jews to Palestine. The Elders were not based in German speaking countries, so they did not wish Germany to rise to a world power, not in the military sense and not in the economic sense. Thus, if these Elders needed Germany for collecting Jews and pushing them somewhere for moving them later to Palestine, the planned outcome was not that Germany would be a major power in the future world order.
War between equal combatants is difficult to predict, many would say, impossible. There is every reason to think that European powers (except for Russia) wanted the South to win the American Civil War, but it did not turn out so. There is also no reason to think that Napoleon’s defeat in Russia was planned. Indeed, Napoleon won all battles and was defeated by scorched earth tactics and winter. If some group of bankers did want Jews to be uprooted from their homes by Nazis and transported to the East, but also that Germany would lose the war, they could not rely on good luck.
It was to be expected that mobile warfare, that the German army had developed, would lead to a fast victory in Poland, and the same concept would give early victories in Ukraine, White-Russia, and parts of Russia. Indeed, if Germans had followed the advice of Machiavelli: taken Moscow (not dividing the troops before the attack and not delaying the attack untli roads got muddy), installed an anti-Communistic government, built anti-Communistic Russian army, and got out of there as fast as possible, Germany probably would have won the Eastern war and then Soviet Union would have either collapsed ot at least been forced to peace. But if, so, Germany would have been victorious.
If the bankers did not want this to happen, they needed somebody in the German side to sabotage German war efforts. Lucky for them, Hitler made a long list of mistakes, if they were mistakes, that led to a German defeat.
I add some other arguments.
Germany would necessarily lose if it was in war at the same time with the UK, France, the USA and the USSR and could not make separate peace agreements with these powers. In the First World War Germany tried to avoid getting into war with the USA. In the Second World War Hitler ordered preparation of the plan to attack Poland immediately after the UK had given Poland guarantees. Thus, by the attack to Poland Germany was in war with England and France. In 1941, after Japan attacked the USA, Hitler declared war on the USA. Germany could not actively fare war with the USA, so this declaration did not help Japan. It also did not matter for the war with the UK, as Hitler did not since 1941 have any change on putting a tight siege on UK transports. The only effect of this war declaration was that sooner or later the USA would send troops to fight Germans. In 1941 Hitler attacked the Soviet Union, but did not take Moscow and force the USSR to make a peace. Thus, in the summer 1942 it was clear that Germany will lose: it was in war with too many major powers. The person, who caused this situation, was Hitler.
Next, let’s ask the following question. Why exactly were Jews transported to the East? If the goal was to uproot them from their homes and to move them to Palestine after the war, Jews could have been placed on concentration and work camps. There was no necessary reason to move them towards the East. But they were moved. First Nazis apparently intended to settle the Jews to the Lublin area in present Poland. Then they decided to move Jews further to the East. Had Germany won the war, it was irrelevant if Jews were in camps in the Lublin area or Poland, or if they were in Ukraine. Both areas would have been in German control, yet not attached to the Reich. It probably would not have mattered if Jews had been in concentration camps in the Reich. But if Germany would lose these areas, there was a difference. Had the Jews beein in the Reich or in post-war Poland, we could have easily calculated the Jewish death toll. As they were taken to the post-war Soviet area, if was possible for the Soviets to claim that six million Jews died. The myth of the Holocaust probably led to higher payments by Germany. In the Exodus and the return form Persia Jews took loot with them. It is an essential part of any exodus.
One should not forget the Battle of Britain. It never had any military chance of leading to the invasion of England. Against the Operation Sealion was the fact that the British controlled the seas. Luftwaffe lost far more pilots than RAF, as pilots landing on enemy area are either killed or taken as POWs. Pilots, not planes, were the limiting factor. The British produced 500 planes in a month, Germans half or it, but pilot training takes a long time. This battle resembles a replay of the threat of Germany to the UK in the First World War. At that time the UK was in trouble and had to turn to Zionist bankers, who were offered the Balfour declaration and who got the USA to the war against Germany. It is not known to me if British had to promise something during the Battle of Britain, but before the war they were against the creation of Israel, yet after the war they agreed to it.
Finally there is the battle of France. If Hitler made so many military mistakes as the accepted history is willing to claim, then how did he have his early successes? It was clear form the military point of view that Poland, attacked from two sides, would lose. It is also understandable that Denmark did not fight, and that Czechoslovakia and Austria yielded. Norway is more problematic, as the British had a harbor city in the North and could have fought, but withdrew. But France is a mystery. It is difficult to understand that no officer checked if tanks can drive through the Ardennes forest. Militaries do check such things, or they are expected to do so. German tank units broke through the Allied defense lines and continued towards Paris, but as they continued fast, they could not have had infantry support. That means that mine fields would have stopped these tanks to an ambush. Yet, the French army did not try to stop Germans. It looks like planned: Germans were let to come, collect the Jews, and they were known to be finally forced to leave.
This is so extremely simple. There was a group: Rothschild, Schiff, B’nai B’rith, Freemasonry. They were the international Jewry and their Masonic helpers that Hitler said try to start a new world war. But in that new war Jews would be pushed out of Europe, Hitler said, which was so, because that was the goal of the war. This group had an obsession of restoring Jews to Palestine. They had been doing it since 1820. In 1840 they gave Jews 100 years time to move to Palestine, if they would not move, they would be forcibly pushed. Rabbi Kalischer told this to Jews in 1842, and mentioned that Rothschild and Cremieux are behind it. When 100 is full and Jews have not moved, appears Hitler. Hitler pushes Jews forcibly to the East, after the war they go to Palestine and world powers accept the creation of Israel. This cannot be any coincidence: Hitler joined a party which had Masonic connections through Theosophy. It is like the USA government had for decades had some plan and then an organization created by the CIA starts realizing the plan. It is not a coincidence: there is a connection. The group of bankers, Zionists, and Masons represented the interests of Jews, City of London and the Wall Street. They did not want to have Germany as a competitor. Thus, if they used German guns (like they had used Japanese guns and American guns before) to move Jews to Palestine, they still wanted Germany to be destroyed at the end. To do that they needed their man inside the Nazi party. The only thing left to do is to find such a man, there had to be one. Such a man, who would uproot Jews, move them where they would be under the USSR, and lose the war for Germany. There is only one such candidate: Adolf Hitler.
I think that should just about fix it. Hitler lost the war on purpose.