I just had a conversation in youtube comments with somebody using the name IwshIcldstrtover. I had put a video showing how my tool to analyze the JFK dictabelt looks like. It is here
The cryptic commentator used the language in a very similar way to one video creator with the name Steve Barber, whose video of Dictabelt I have earlier commented.
In 1979 Stephen Barber, called Steve Barber, found the HOLD crosstalk. I have no way of knowing if IwshIcldstrtover is this same Steve Barber, but one Steve Barber is a known JFK researcher in the jfkassassinationforum.
The discussion was quite interesting. Maybe IwshIcldstrtover just wanted to point me to the correct direction in his charming way of commenting. Anyway, I already had taken that way. Back in 1961, there was a rogue state building its atom bomb. CIA was discussing the secret Dimona reactor.
Kennedy was alarmed of Israel´s bomb program, as declassified files show. American Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) went to investigate the plant in 1962, but they were not allowed to make a full investigation. The plant produced plutonium. The initial uranium to start the plant, had been obtained from France. In 1963 Kennedy sent ultimatums to Israel concerning the Dimona reactor and it was known that Kennedy intended to stop Israel´s nuclear weapon program. Then Kennedy was assassinated. Lyndon B. Johnson did not press Israel any more. Johnson even accepted without objections that Israel sank USS Liberty in 1967.
So, one natural line of investigation in the assassination was proliferation of nuclear weapons. Jumping to 1982, a scientific panel was commissioned to investigate the findings of the House Select Committee of Assassinations (HSCA) concerning the analysis of the JFK Dictabelt. If this had happened in the Nordic countries, crime investigation had been done my the police. As assassination of the president is a political crime, the police in charge would have been the security police, whose workers are police officers. The USA does not have a security police, they have the CIA. This investigation would probably have fallen on the department of counter intelligence. At the time of the assassination it had been headed by James Jesus Angleton, a man with strong Mossad connections, but Angleton retired 1975.
Instead of giving the investigation of the HSCA findings to FBI or CIA, a scientific panel was set up. Now, assuming that Iran tried to build a nuclear weapon and a president wanting to halt these plans got suddenly assassinated, and you would decide to set up a scientific panel to investigate the murder case, who would you select for the panel? Yes, definitely, you would look for American nuclear weapon scientists with Iranian sounding name who have no connection to crime investigation or to any scientific fields relevant to the investigation. What were the names of the four scientists who co-authored the rebuttal of the article by Donald B. Thomas in 2005? They were Garwin R.L., Chernoff H., Horowitz P. and the 90-year old Nobel prize winner Ramsey N. F., who headed the panel in 1982. All belonged to the scientific panel. Richard Garwin is Jewish and the author of the hydrogen bomb. Herman Chernoff is a Jewish applied mathematician and physicist. Paul Horowitz (I wonder what could be his ethnic origins? Horowitz, that´s an Iranian name) is a physicist and electrical engineer known for his work on extraterrestrial intelligence. Norman F. Ramsey Jr. was not Jewish, but he was a nuclear physicist in the Manhattan project.
Naively, one would expect that a murder investigation would be run by crime investigators, who would consult experts from relevant fields, which in the case of the JFK Dictabelt are radio networks, handgun noise and acoustics, so from the same fields as the researches of the acoustics firm used by HSCA, specializing in locating shooters by echo correlation. These fields are closer to what I know than to the fields of these panelists. There hardly is any reason to expect that deep knowledge of hydrogen bombs and the Manhattan project is needed. However, should you try to hide the connections of the assassination to a nuclear weapon project of a rogue state, you should find high-profile scientists, who would be willing to cooperate. What was by the way the full name of Ruby, who shot Oswald?
What I learned from IwshIcldstrtover was that Steve Barber, the rock drummer, who according to the video in youtube, found the crosstalk HOLD by listening to a record distributed as an addition to a magazine issue, actually worked at that time with other JFK researchers an later with the scientific panel. So, he was not an outside, who just happened to notice the crosstalk. He already was involved in JFK assassination research and the scientific panel did not simply thank him for finding the crosstalk and bluntly answer that we have two Nobelists and a room full of experts, no help needed. They actually supported Steve Barber´s work and provided him with full copies of the recordings. Judging from my own experience, that is unusual in science, it must be very unusual in crime investigation, and I would expect that it is even more unusual if the crime is a political assassination of the president. Trying to contribute to such an investigation would be seen as an effort to influence the panel.
I find traces of falsification in the signal Hold2 on the Gray Audiograph. If Steve Barber found the crosstalk by listening to a record made from the Audiograph and Dictabelt, he did not have access to Audiograph and he could not modify the signal Hold2 in Audiograph. But somebody did so, and then the crosstalk was found. Or maybe Barber contacted the scientific panel and told he heard a crosstalk, it was checked, there was no crosstalk, but for someone it seemed like a good idea to put the crosstalk there. How I think the crosstalk is done? I think originally the signal in the beginning of Hold2 is taken from Hold1, because when I listen a small part of Hold2, I hear “hold it up”. When I listen it all, the part “it up” cannot be heard and it becomes “hold everything”. When I look at the signal Hold2, I see intervals, where the signal wave form is very regular. 1979-82 was still the time of analogue signal processing, but it was not prehistory. At that time researchers studied subliminal messages, some rock bands put such to their records. They could do mixing and modifying audio signals.
But OK, we cannot know if this was so, and you can never prove anything if others refuse to accept the proof.