There was a comment from Chris to my previous post on JFK. So here is a comparison b etween one motorcycle and another
I just watched one video set to me by a friend. It seemed to imply in the beginning that Vice president L. B. Johnson had some active role in the assassination. I did not buy the claim that Johnson was so blinded by his wish to become the president as to kill his election partner. I think Johnson knew something, just like George W. Bush Jr. most probably knew something of WTC, he had to know, but neither one of these two democratically elected leaders were the power behind what happened.
This view of mine is in my opinion strongly supported by the fact that in both cases there was a wide-scale cover-up. US presidents have much power, but it is limited by the American democracy. US presidents can be assassinated by a lone madman, which is bad enough considering how difficult it often is to assassinate a dictator in many other countries. They can also be taken to the legal court and forced to resign. US presidents cannot keep secret even their own most private doings, not to say anything of pulling together a large scale cover-up.
To cover up something of the scale of the 911 attack or the Kennedy assassination requires real power. You need power over the media, but you also need power over the academia so that you can ask a set of trusted scientists, as the Warren Commission, to write such a report as you want, and to hinder publication of alternative views in the main stream scientific forums. Even this amount of power is not enough. You also need power over the legal system, so that some too ambitious attorney does not try to make a court case, or if makes, will surely not win. As it is repeatedly said about conspiracies, if there are many people involved, somebody always talks. This is true, thus to pull thru a successful conspiracy requires so much media and other power, that even though somebody always talks, you have the control of what people think about things they may hear. If you control thinking, nobody will believe or even agree to listen to those who decide to talk.
No US president or vice president has such power, but in many countries dictators have all this power. It is not necessarily true that nobody in the States has such power, only that the democratically elected leaders do not have it.
So who killed Kennedy if not Lyndon B. Johnson? Or maybe it was Castro, or Cuban refugees, or Ku Klux Klan, or the Mob, or the jealous wife, or the always nasty Russians? Could it not have simply been Lee Harvey Oswald after all? Can this question ever be answered?
Probably it can. Oswald might have been the sniper in the Texas School Book Depository, or maybe he was not, but it does not much matter. Oswald was involved and there was a sniper in the Book Depository. About the candidates behind the assassination as listed after Johnson, which one of them has the described power over the USA? None, right. The Mob and the Klan could be involved, but not only by themselves. They could pull the trigger, but where is the gain for the Mob and who protects the Klan outside its support area?
Now, Oswald was not a lone gunman, since there were two other shooters, one from the behind and one from the front. There is more that can be learned from the Dictabelt. In the Dictabelt there is talking right at the time of the shots: “hold it up right there, we`re gonna do it. I, I got it, let`s see if you got it”. The ending could be also “hope your arse you got it”, or it could be many things. The voice is faint. What I am sure of is that it is not “until the homicide and other investigators can get there”. The five shots I located 52.4 s, 53.2s, 55.6s and 58.8s 58.9s are as follows. Just after the talking stops, comes 55.6s, then there is a bell at 56.2s ringing once, it may be saying 12:30, then comes 58.8 and 58.9s. The first two are at the phrase: “let´s see if you got it”. So this is Dallas Police Channel 1, those who talk have police radios. What should that mean? The talkers are not necessarily police officers, but they have police radios. Why are they using radios and why is there the motorcycle noise? Maybe they need to communicate through a radio and the motorcycle noise is there to hide the communication from those in the police, who have no special reason to listen to the police channel very carefully.
We may assume there is one sniper with a rifle, he misses the first shot, therefore a standby sniper fires 53.2s and also misses JFK but hits Connelly. A the last shot there is a sniper at the grassy knoll making sure that JFK dies, he fires when hearing the third shot.
What this means? Ruby (a Jewish gangster, probably from Meyer Lansky`s Murder Inc) kills Oswald and apparently had help from the Dallas police in order to get close to Oswald. The shooter from the grassy knoll was probably a mafia gangster employed to the job. There is a confession by James Files and a bullet case which was later found from the place Files told. There is a claim that the case is not from the year 1963, since at the bottom of the case is the type marker and it fits technical drawings, which were made years after 1963. Unfortunately, this argument does not solve the question, since it is perfectly possible that the case is from 1963. It is possible that in 1963 there was a disagreement between what was in the technical drawing of the case and what was implemented in the machine making the cases. Later, when the machinery was moved to a new place and the production line was reviewed, this difference was noticed and it was removed in the cheapest way, by changing the drawing and not by changing the machine. Apart from this issue with the bullet case, there are no good reasons for discarding the confession of James Files.
Put together: some Dallas policemen, probably Texas Klanmen, who did not like Kennedy, and two mafia assassins together killed JFK, later there is a cover-up which includes the Warren Commission and media and enough skills to falsify the Dictabelt, as the signal Hold2 seems to be forged. L. B. Johnson probably knows about the assassination plot. This is just like the WTC case and therefore the probable culprit is the same. We have to look at the Middle East.
So what is there in the Middle East? It is the radical Muslims. Al Qaeda did this. Osama bin Laden did it. JFK tried to stop the spread of nuclear weapon technology, like Iran is now trying to get a nuclear weapon. At that time the radicals had just managed to steal weapon-level uranium from an American installation, apparently with inside agreement. Did L.B. Johnson try to stop any country’s nuclear weapon program? I cannot remember. I was too young and at that time news were often falsified.
I think the reason could be here.
If one were stupid enough, one could follow the leads from the cover-up. When Donald B. Thomas published an article on the Dictabelt 2001, he was rebutted by Linsker et al. Linsker is new, but the other names in the rebuttal paper, Garwin, Chernoff, Horowitz, and Ramsey, were in the Warren Commission, or was it so? It would be natural to check if any of them had a connection to the main players in the Middle East, notably to Osama bin Laden.